Regulation Impact Statement Updates
Official website for publishing regulatory impact analysis information for regulatory decisions announced by the Australian Government, COAG and COAG Councils.
Application of the Regional Reference Node Test to the Reliability and Emergency Reserve Trader
COAG Decision Regulation Impact Statement – Australian Energy Market Commission
On 19 December 2019, the Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) released the final rule determination and final rule titled National Electricity Amendment (Application of the Regional Reference Node Test to the Reliability and Emergency Reserve Trader) Rule 2019, to create transparency, predictability and consistency for the market, and remove as far as possible the need for Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) to exercise discretion in determining how to apply the test.
The AEMC’s final rule:
- extends the application of the Regional Reference Node (RRN) test to the Reliability and Emergency Reserve Trader (RERT), as proposed by AEMO. This creates consistency in how intervention pricing is applied as between directions and the RERT and avoids imposing higher than necessary prices on consumers in cases where there is no economic rationale for the use of intervention pricing in connection with the RERT,
- clarifies that intervention pricing should apply where an intervention responds to a region wide scarcity of a market traded commodity (i.e. energy or a market ancillary service, noting frequency control ancillary services (FCAS) is currently the only market ancillary service, or a direct substitute for those services - e.g. reducing generation output to reduce the amount of FCAS required in a region). With the exception of FCAS, a market traded commodity does not include system security services (e.g. system strength or voltage control) as there is no spot market for such services,
- clarifies the circumstances in which a localised deficiency of a market traded commodity should trigger intervention pricing. Consistent with the intent underpinning the current test, the final rule makes clear that intervention pricing should not apply where the intervention responds to a localised deficiency of a market traded commodity in a part of the network which effectively (due to a network or other constraint) does not include the RRN. However, where a localised deficiency of a market traded commodity occurs in a part of the network that includes the RRN, intervention pricing should apply. This is appropriate as it is important to preserve scarcity signals where scarcity occurs in a part of the network that contains the major load centre,
- clarifies that intervention pricing should not apply in circumstances where the reason for the intervention is to obtain a service that is not traded in the market (for example system strength, inertia, voltage control), even if the provision of that service results in the provision of energy or market ancillary services as a by-product. This reflects the Commission's view that there is no economic rationale for applying intervention pricing in connection with interventions to obtain a non-market traded commodity because there is no relevant price signal to preserve. The use of intervention pricing in such circumstances can cause rather than reduce market distortion, and
- clarifies the approach to be adopted when multiple intervention events coincide. The final rule brings the wording of the test into line with the approach adopted by AEMO under its Intervention pricing methodology and clarifies, where multiple interventions coincide, which interventions should influence the intervention price and which should not.
The final determination has been assessed by the Office of Best Practice Regulation as compliant with requirements for a Council of Australian Governments Decision RIS.
Please note: the final determination and rule are web accessible in PDF only and any accessibility queries should be directed to the Australian Energy Market Commission